Després del tiroteig de Colorado, els EUA han de plantejar-se el control de les armes

23-07-2012

America needs to talk about gun control in the wake of the Colorado shooting
GARY YOUNGE (The Guardian, 21-07-2012)
Sympathy for Aurora's victims should not stop us addressing the fact that more than 84 people are shot to death daily in the US.

The chorus of empathetic responses to the tragic shootings at the Aurora movie theater, near Denver, Colorado early Friday morning marks a stubborn refrain in a perennial American elegy. Different singers mouthing different words, but basically singing the same song.

Psychological profiles of the shooter emerge, along with portraits of the victims, while the political class closes ranks so that the nation can heal. Incanted tones to sooth a permanent scar.

All rituals serve a purpose. And this one is no different.

At least 12 people have died. Their families must be given space to mourn, and that space should be respected. But it does not honour the dead to insist that there must be no room in that space for rational thought and critical appraisal. Indeed, such situations demand both.

For one can only account for so many "isolated" incidents before it becomes necessary to start dealing with a pattern. It is simply not plausible to understand events in Colorado this Friday without having a conversation about guns in a country where more than 84 people a day are killed with guns, and more than twice that number are injured with them.

Amid all the column inches and airtime devoted to these horrific slayings, though, that elephant in the room will remain affectionately patted, discreetly fed and politely indulged. To claim that "this is not the time" ignores the reality that America has found itself incapable of finding any appropriate time to have this urgent conversation. The victims in Colorado deserve at least that. And these tragedies take place everyday, albeit on a smaller scale.

America's president, Barack Obama, understands this. The number of homicide victims in his home town of Chicago this year has outnumbered those of US troops serving in Kabul.

Speaking in Fort Myers, Florida on Friday morning, Obama was right to suspend the routine campaign rhetoric and play the statesman. Nobody wants to hear about Mitt Romney's tax records and stimulating the economy on a day like this. There will be other days for electioneering.

But he was wrong to insist on this:

    "There are going to be other days for politics. This is a day for prayer and reflection."

For what are we to reflect on if not how this, and so many other similar calamities, came about. Those who insist that we should not "play politics" with the victim's grief conveniently ignore that politics is what caused that grief. Not party politics. But a blend of opportunism on the right that flagrantly mischaracterises the issue, and spinelessness on the left that refuses to address it.

Americans are no more prone to mental illness or violence than any other people in the world. What they do have is more guns: roughly, 90 for every 100 people. And regions and states with higher rates of gun ownership have significantly higher rates of homicide than states with lower rates of gun ownership.

The trite insistence that "guns don't kill people, people kill people" simply avoids the reality that people can kill people much more easily with guns than anything else that's accessible. Americans understand this. That's why a plurality supports greater gun control, and a majority thinks the sale of firearms should be more tightly regulated.

The trouble is that people feel powerless to do anything about it. The gun lobby has proved sufficiently potent in rallying opposition to virtually all gun control measures that Democrats have all but given up on arguing for it. In the meantime, the country is literally and metaphorically dying for it.

Gun control is possible. There are both a constituency for it and an argument for it. But it can't happen without a political coalition prepared to fight for it.

If America can elect a black president, it can do this.

compartir a: 
             



MON - Altres articles

Les falses esperances d'Obama per 2014 i el seu llegat


Burocràcia inoxidable


La regulació de la premsa: podria haver reconciliació


El model alemany no es pot exportar


Enlairat pel bé comú


Per què l'Àsia es condemna a un paper de comparsa


Hi ha poques possibilitats que la Gran Bretanya surti de la UE


MON - Altres articles

paginació
first  prev 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 next  last

Les falses esperances d'Obama per 2014 i el seu llegat 10-05-2013

Obama’s false hopes for 2014 — and his legacyGEORGE F. WILL (The Washington Post, 09-05-2013)…

Burocràcia inoxidable 10-05-2013

CHI DETIENE LE VERE LEVE DEL POTEREBurocrazia inossidabileFRANCESCO GIAVAZZI (Corriere della Sera, 09-05-2013)Uno dei motivi,…

La regulació de la premsa: podria haver reconciliació 09-05-2013

Press regulation: you couldn't make it upEditorial (The Guardian, 08-05-2013)Should Sir Christopher Geidt have any…

El model alemany no es pot exportar 09-05-2013

The German model is not for exportMARTIN WOLF (Financial Times, 08-05-2013)Forcing the eurozone to mimic…

Enlairat pel bé comú 09-05-2013

Elevated by the common goodMICHAEL GERSON (The Washington Post, 08-05-2013) The Rev. Jim Wallis is…

Per què l'Àsia es condemna a un paper de comparsa 09-05-2013

Perché l’Asia ci condanna a un ruolo da comprimariBILL EMMOTT (La Stampa, 08-05-2013)Perplessi. Sconcertati. Sprezzanti.…

Hi ha poques possibilitats que la Gran Bretanya surti de la UE 08-05-2013

There's little chance of Britain leaving the EUPETER KELLNER (The Guardian, 07-05-2013)Although public discontent with…

paginació
first  prev 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 next  last

Activitats de la FCO

Imatge de Activitat

Taula rodona sobre "El paper de la banca en temps de crisi" organitzat per la Fundació Catalunya Oberta amb la col•laboració del Banc Sabadell.